Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Iva Jovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Nov at 12:56 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Friedsam vs I. Jovic

GER
0
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Friedsam 0 - 1 Jovic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Anna-Lena Friedsam winning 0 and Iva Jovic winning 2. The last match between Iva Jovic and Anna-Lena Friedsam was at the Austin 125 - Austin, 04-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Iva Jovic getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Friedsam | 0 |
| Jovic | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Austin 125 - Austin(11-04-25)
A. Friedsam vs I. Jovic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,078,782 | Career Prize Money | $959,230 |
| 60.03% (398-265) | Career Total W/L | 72.07% (80-31) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 15 | Titles | 6 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.33% (14-10) |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
A. Friedsam vs I. Jovic Match Preview:
- Iva Jovic's second serve winning rate in recent months is 40.99%, slightly trailing Anna-Lena Friedsam's 42.19%. Could this small difference impact the match outcome? It might, as there's a strong correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- In return game prowess, Jovic has been winning 47.86% of her opponent's second serve points, whereas Friedsam exceeds this with 51.86%. For first serve returns, Jovic leads with 34.27% compared to Friedsam's 33.72%. These figures heavily influence predictions on which player is favored.
- Under pressure, when saving breakpoints, Friedsam demonstrates marginal superiority by saving 54.52% of the time, compared to Jovic's 51.94%. This could be pivotal in in-game betting strategies.
- Both players have similar overall match performance over the past year, with Jovic holding a 67.86% win rate, closely matched by Friedsam's 66.67%.
- Their best playing surfaces differ distinctly: Jovic excels on Grass with an 89% win rate, whereas Friedsam thrives on I.hard with the same win rate. Notably, Jovic's weakest surface is Friedsam's best, and vice versa, suggesting surface will play a crucial role.
- In tournament level comparisons, Jovic has succeeded more often in > $10K Challengers/ITF with a 76.00% win rate, slightly better than Friedsam's 70.21% in the same category.
- Considering the caliber of their opponents over the last year, Jovic has faced tougher competition, with an average opponent rank of 191.41, compared to Friedsam's 258.97. Could this experience against stronger adversaries benefit Jovic?
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Jovic has historically fared better, winning 72% of such sets, topping Friedsam's 65% success rate. This could be decisive in a closely contested battle.
Editorial Prediction (November 4, 2025, UTC):
As the match approaches, key performance metrics reveal interesting dynamics. Iva Jovic and Anna-Lena Friedsam exhibit close overall match win percentages, but differ significantly in play styles and strengths on various surfaces.
While Friedsam has a slight edge in second serve and breakpoint performance, Jovic's ability to return serves effectively and handle higher-ranked competition could pose challenges for Friedsam. Furthermore, Jovic's proven success in deciding sets might give her the upper hand in a tight contest.
Considering these factors, particularly Jovic's capacity to handle pressure and return effectively, she emerges as the slight favorite to win the upcoming match against Anna-Lena Friedsam.
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Iva Jovic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Friedsam vs I. Jovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 3 | Games Won | 12 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:18:46 | Average Match Time | 1:18:46 |
| 63% (44/70) | 1st Serve % | 64% (29/45) |
| 59% (26/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (20/29) |
| 31% (8/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 75% (12/16) |
| 0% (0/2) | Break Pts Won % | 45% (5/11) |
| 29% (13/45) | Return Points Win % | 51% (36/70) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Friedsam Recent Matches Played
I. Jovic Recent Matches Played

A. Friedsam vs I. Jovic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.03% (398/265) | YTD Win/Loss | 72.07% (80/31) |
| 58.03% (896/648) | Sets Win/Loss | 67.19% (170/83) |
| 53.49% (7669/6668) | Games Win/Loss | 57.04% (1329/1001) |
| 55.67% (108/86) | Hard Win/Loss | 70.51% (55/23) |
| 59.66% (139/94) | Clay Win/Loss | 73.91% (17/6) |
| 67.16% (135/66) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 45.71% (16/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 88.89% (8/1) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 1583 | Aces Total | 140 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1702 | Total Double Faults | 214 |
| 1:11:51 | Average Match Time | 1:42:24 |
| 464.98 | Average Opponent Rank | 283.92 |
| 65% (22459/34590) | 1st Serve % | 61% (4409/7188) |
| 65% (14646/22459) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (2767/4409) |
| 46% (5576/12129) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1404/2779) |
| 45% (1711/3768) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (484/962) |
| 43% (14589/34179) | Return Points Win % | 48% (3509/7311) |
| 36.84% (21/36) | Slam W/L | 58.33% (7/5) |
| 33.33% (10/20) | Masters W/L | 46.15% (6/7) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.88% (101/90) | Main Tour W/L | 77.78% (7/2) |
| 67.85% (211/100) | Challenger W/L | 77.78% (56/16) |
| 76.81% (53/16) | Futures W/L | 80.00% (4/1) |
| 60% (389/649) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 72% (79/109) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (91/175) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (9/21) |
| 54% (123/228) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (22/33) |
| 85% (391/334) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (77/72) |
| 14% (391/56) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (77/5) |
| 23% (272/63) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (34/8) |